Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Bagnis vs Matteo Viola Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bagnis vs Viola analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Bagnis vs Matteo Viola Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bagnis 1 - 0 Viola
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bagnis has won 51.55% of points on their second serve, while Viola has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bagnis, in recent form, has won 50.09% of their opponent's second serve points, while Viola has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.38% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bagnis has saved 64.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Viola has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bagnis has won 65.63% of matches played (W/L 42/ 22), with Viola winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bagnis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 597/ 368), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Viola has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 119/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Bagnis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.97% of matches (W/L 20/ 9), where as Viola has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bagnis winning 1 times and Viola being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bagnis winning 2 and Viola winning 0. The last match between Bagnis and Viola was at the Cordenons Challenger, 14-08-2018, First, Clay with Facundo Bagnis getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bagnis and Viola have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bagnis winning 0 times and Viola 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bagnis winning 0, and Viola 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bagnis has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.5 while Viola has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bagnis has won 79% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Viola has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bagnis has converted 43.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Viola has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
122
Rank
55
High
34
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
831
Rank
118
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
59% (636-438)
Career Total W/L
53% (563-490)
70% (28-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,274,440
Career Prize Money
$206,441
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Facundo Bagnis vs Matteo Viola For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bagnis VS Viola
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Matteo Viola |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:58 | 1:6:58 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (30/52) | 68% (27/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (21/30) | 48% (13/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (14/22) | 23% (3/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/9) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (24/40) | 33% (17/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Matteo Viola
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Matteo Viola |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (28/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (58/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (467/411) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (27/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 149 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 88 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 270.77 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1844/2878) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1254/1844) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (533/1034) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (124/287) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1165/2851) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 82% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (28/39) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (9/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (25/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (25/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Facundo Bagnis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Facundo Bagnis
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Facundo Bagnis
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
92%
(
12 of
13)
24
Total Points Won
2
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gregoire Barrere
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
63%
(
31 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Clement Chidekh
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Viola Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Matteo Viola
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Omar Giacalone
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Matteo Viola
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Pavel Nejedly
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Matteo Viola
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Matteo Viola
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Matteo Viola
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bagnis Vs Viola Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bagnis are available here and Viola photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
